Comparative Evaluation of Yield Performance and Earliness in Maize (Zea mays L.) Hybrids under the National Uniform Yield Trial (NUYT)

Authors

  • Najma Parveen Maize Research Station, Ayub Agricultural Research Institute, Faisalabad Author
  • Arbaz Hassan Maize Research Station, Ayub Agricultural Research Institute, Faisalabad Author
  • Muhammad Saqib Sohail Cotton Research Station, Ayub Agricultural Research Institute, Faisalabad Author
  • Misbah Hanif Maize & Millets Research Institute, Yusafwala, Sahiwal Author
  • Muhammad Dilshad Department of Agronomy, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad Author
  • Iqra Anwar Department of Botany, University of Agriculture, Faisalabad Author
  • Tariq Ahmad Department of Plant Breeding and Genetics, University of Agriculture, Peshawar Author
  • Barkat Ali Sorghum Research Sub-station, Dera Ghazi Khan Author
  • Shakra Jamil Agricultural Biotechnology Research Institute, Ayub Agricultural Research Institute, Faisalabad Author
  • Iqra Ibrar Maize & Millets Research Institute, Yusafwala, Sahiwal Author
  • Zaryab Hassan Maize & Millets Research Institute, Yusafwala, Sahiwal Author
  • Aamir Ghani Maize & Millets Research Institute, Yusafwala, Sahiwal Author

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.3333/fz88hg93

Keywords:

Maize, Genetic Variability, Seed Yield, Forage Yield, Genotype Evaluation, Correlation Analysis

Abstract

The objective of this study was to assess the performance of 12 maize genotypes, including one check genotype (genotype 1), for phenology, morphology, and yield traits in the field. A randomized complete block design with three replications was used. Observations were made for DFM, DFF, PH, EH, TPH, TEH, SP, yield (kg) and yield (kg/ha). Analysis of variance revealed significant differences for most traits, suggesting that there is a considerable amount of genetic variability. The differences among genotypes were statistically significant at (P ≤ 0.05). Mean comparisons were performed using the LSD test at 5% probability level. Standard errors (±SE) were calculated for all measured traits, and confidence intervals (95%) confirmed the reliability of the observed differences among genotypes. Average performance revealed that several genotypes outperformed the check for important traits. Genotypes 3 and 7 were early flowering (DFM = 66 days; DFF = 68 days), while genotypes 4 and 11 were late flowering. PH ranged from 165 cm (check) to 235 cm (genotype 5), and EH from 110 to 150 cm. TPH and TEH were higher in genotype 5, while the lowest was in genotype 3. SP varied from 82.4% to 90.0% (genotypes 2 and 5, respectively). Genotypes differed in yield, with the highest yield (7.2 kg; 11946 kg/ha) in genotype 12, followed by genotypes 8 and 2, whereas the lowest yield was in genotype 3. Correlation studies showed that yield was positively correlated with PH, EH, and related traits, suggesting they could play a significant role in yield enhancement. In general, genotype 12 was the best performer, followed by genotypes 8 and 2. This research suggests that selection for plant architecture and yield components can lead to improved maize yield.

Additional Files

Published

2026-02-04

How to Cite

Comparative Evaluation of Yield Performance and Earliness in Maize (Zea mays L.) Hybrids under the National Uniform Yield Trial (NUYT). (2026). International Journal of Agriculture and Sustainable Development, 8(1), 140-151. https://doi.org/10.3333/fz88hg93

Similar Articles

1-10 of 92

You may also start an advanced similarity search for this article.

Most read articles by the same author(s)